(UnhappyFranchisee.Com) Among other things, proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill) states:
§ 918. Remedies.
(a) Relief.–A person that violates this chapter or a regulation of the department shall be liable to the franchisee for legal and equitable relief.
(b) Costs and attorney fees.–A court may award costs and attorney fees to a prevailing franchisee under subsection (a).
What do you think of the Remedies provision of the proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill)?
Do you believe that making this provision law will be good for franchising?
Why or why not? Please share a comment below.
Go back to the main page: PA’s Responsible Franchise Practices Bill: Overview and Discussion
ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE PA RESPONSIBLE FRANCHISE PRACTICES BILL 1620? PLEASE SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.
TAGS: Franchise Remedies, Franchise Renewal Agreements, franchise legislation, PA House Bill 1620, PA Responsible Franchise Practices Bill, Fair Franchising Legislation, Franchise laws, Pennsylvania State Rep. Peter Daley
Could someone explain the joke at the end of my previous post to Worried Bird…
It appears that two owners of small Utah-based franchise companies – Mitch & Manny Cypers of…
Spray Foam Genie is a franchise opportunity offered and maintained by the controversial and embattled…
On the heels of initiating an arbitration complaint against the franchisor (as required by the…
The Franchise Disclosure Document of the Spray Foam Genie franchise states that its parent company, Phoenix Franchise…
The Furry Land mobile pet grooming franchise opportunity promoted & sold by the controversial Phoenix Franchise…