(UnhappyFranchisee.Com) Among other things, proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill) states:
§ 918. Remedies.
(a) Relief.–A person that violates this chapter or a regulation of the department shall be liable to the franchisee for legal and equitable relief.
(b) Costs and attorney fees.–A court may award costs and attorney fees to a prevailing franchisee under subsection (a).
What do you think of the Remedies provision of the proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill)?
Do you believe that making this provision law will be good for franchising?
Why or why not? Please share a comment below.
Go back to the main page: PA’s Responsible Franchise Practices Bill: Overview and Discussion
ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE PA RESPONSIBLE FRANCHISE PRACTICES BILL 1620? PLEASE SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.
TAGS: Franchise Remedies, Franchise Renewal Agreements, franchise legislation, PA House Bill 1620, PA Responsible Franchise Practices Bill, Fair Franchising Legislation, Franchise laws, Pennsylvania State Rep. Peter Daley
Last year’s hot new franchise opportunity sometimes becomes this year’s discounted resale (and, in the…
DonutNV franchise owners who invested in multiple territories reportedly left the system in late 2023. …
Daryl Poe was celebrated as DonutNV’s 2nd franchisee. The local paper states that he operates…
I read a lot of Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs). Most are pretty straightforward and make…
In a video interview Franchise Sidekick celebrates their clients, John & Dana Owens, becoming DonutNV…
DonutNV franchise owners, franchise locations and ownership transfers are normally included in a franchisor’s Franchise Disclosure…