(UnhappyFranchisee.Com) Among other things, proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill) states:
§ 918. Remedies.
(a) Relief.–A person that violates this chapter or a regulation of the department shall be liable to the franchisee for legal and equitable relief.
(b) Costs and attorney fees.–A court may award costs and attorney fees to a prevailing franchisee under subsection (a).
What do you think of the Remedies provision of the proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill)?
Do you believe that making this provision law will be good for franchising?
Why or why not? Please share a comment below.
Go back to the main page: PA’s Responsible Franchise Practices Bill: Overview and Discussion
ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE PA RESPONSIBLE FRANCHISE PRACTICES BILL 1620? PLEASE SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.
TAGS: Franchise Remedies, Franchise Renewal Agreements, franchise legislation, PA House Bill 1620, PA Responsible Franchise Practices Bill, Fair Franchising Legislation, Franchise laws, Pennsylvania State Rep. Peter Daley
David Rutkauskas was appointed to the Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board in November, 2024. Sean Kelly, publisher…
Has DonutNV franchisee Lee Alcorn, of Woodstock, GA, ceased operation? If so, we wish Lee and…
Have Ridgefield, Connecticut DonutNV franchisees Michael Zeitz & Jane Zeitz ceased operations? If so, we…
Have Darlene & Luis Ortega discontinued operation of their DonutNV franchise business? If so, we’d like to…
In 2024, nearly all of the DonutNV staff turned over, including its celebrated President Scott…
Yesterday, I posted an article about DonutNV’s aggressive selling of deep-fried donuts, sugary toppings and…