TERIYAKI MADNESS Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), CA Impoundment Order

The Teriyaki Madness Franchise Disclosure Document (posted below), submitted for CA state registration in April, 2013, raised questions and objections from the California Department of Corporations – Securities Regulation Division.

(UnhappyFranchisee.Com)  The most serious of the objections was the financial condition of the franchisor.

The Teriyaki Madness franchisor reportedly had a whopping $218 in the bank and stockholders equity of $-25,726.68 (That’s right.  NEGATIVE $25,726.68)

CA Senior Corporations Counsel Shohreh Aram wrote:

Franchisor’s audited financial statements as of December 31, 2012 indicate that it has working capital of $218.  It does not appear that the franchisor has satisfied the requirements of Rule 310.313 for adequate financial arrangements to fulfill obligations in the offering

California Corporations Commissioner Jan Lynn Owen has issued an order that Teriyaki Madness franchise fees for any franchises sold in California must be placed in escrow and not released to the franchisor until the franchisee’s unit has is open for business.

Read:  Teriyaki Madness Impound Order

Additionally, Teriyaki Madness is required to include the following warning on its California FDD:

#4  The franchisee will be required to make an estimated initial investment ranging from $234,048 to $327,213.  this amount exceeds the Franchisor’s Stockholder Equity as of March, 2013 which is $-25,726.68.

CA Corporations Counsel Shohreh Aram raised the concern shared on UnhappyFranchisee.Com (read TERIYAKI MADNESS Franchise Warning) that Teriyaki Madness was being highly selective in including profitability numbers from only one “affiliate” (not franchise) location in its Item 19 Financial Performance Representation.

Teriyaki Madness Attorney Michael Drumm added the profitability for a second “affiliate” location, which was 28% lower than the first.  However, neither of these locations are Teriyaki Madness franchises, and neither pay royalties.

Read:  Teriyaki Madness CA Correspondence (includes required changes to Teriyaki Madness FDD).

Read:  Teriyaki Madness 2013 FDD (does NOT include CA-required changes).

READ:  Teriyaki Madness 2014 FDD (Franchise Disclosure Document)

Also read:

TERIYAKI MADNESS Franchise Warning

ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE TERIYAKI MADNESS FRANCHISE OPPORTUNITY?  SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.

Contact UnhappyFranchisee.com

Tags: Teriyaki Madness, Teriyaki Madness franchise, Teriyaki Madness FDD, Teriyaki Madness Franchise Disclosure Document, Teriyaki Madness franchise warning, Rod Arreola, Alan Arreola, Michael Haith, Franchise Sherpas

unhappyzee

Recent Posts

DONUTNV Franchise Owners Selling at a Loss

Last year’s hot new franchise opportunity sometimes becomes this year’s discounted resale (and, in the…

2 days ago

DonutNV MultiUnit NC Franchisees Left the System. Not Disclosed?

DonutNV franchise owners who invested in multiple territories reportedly left the system in late 2023. …

5 days ago

DonutNV 2nd Franchisee Daryl Poe Not Disclosed… Anywhere?

Daryl Poe was celebrated as DonutNV’s 2nd franchisee.  The local paper states that he operates…

2 weeks ago

DONUTNV Franchisee Mike Flowers Not Disclosed in FDDs?

I read a lot of Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs).  Most are pretty straightforward and make…

2 weeks ago

DonutNV Franchise Owners John & Dana Owens, Ocala, FL, Not Disclosed

In a video interview Franchise Sidekick celebrates their clients, John & Dana Owens, becoming DonutNV…

2 weeks ago

DONUTNV Franchise Owners Thomas & Rachelle Hughes Not Disclosed

DonutNV franchise owners, franchise locations and ownership transfers are normally included in a franchisor’s Franchise Disclosure…

2 weeks ago