(UnhappyFranchisee.Com) Among other things, proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill) states:
§ 918. Remedies.
(a) Relief.–A person that violates this chapter or a regulation of the department shall be liable to the franchisee for legal and equitable relief.
(b) Costs and attorney fees.–A court may award costs and attorney fees to a prevailing franchisee under subsection (a).
What do you think of the Remedies provision of the proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill)?
Do you believe that making this provision law will be good for franchising?
Why or why not? Please share a comment below.
Go back to the main page: PA’s Responsible Franchise Practices Bill: Overview and Discussion
ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE PA RESPONSIBLE FRANCHISE PRACTICES BILL 1620? PLEASE SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.
TAGS: Franchise Remedies, Franchise Renewal Agreements, franchise legislation, PA House Bill 1620, PA Responsible Franchise Practices Bill, Fair Franchising Legislation, Franchise laws, Pennsylvania State Rep. Peter Daley
Relatively few franchise sellers blatantly provide outright false financial representations. Far more provide selective, partial,…
Great news from the Federal Trade Commission! Could DonutNV be next? Read the Press Release…
The Koala Insulation franchise was founded by Scott Marr and franchise attorney Keith Gross. Koala…
Koala Insulation was founded by Scott Marr and now-former congressional candidate and franchisee attorney Keith…
The Wallaby Windows franchise was founded by Scott Marr and Keith Gross, promoted by Franchise…
The embattled mini-donut franchise seller has filed its Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) in a single…