(UnhappyFranchisee.Com) Among other things, proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill) states:
§ 918. Remedies.
(a) Relief.–A person that violates this chapter or a regulation of the department shall be liable to the franchisee for legal and equitable relief.
(b) Costs and attorney fees.–A court may award costs and attorney fees to a prevailing franchisee under subsection (a).
What do you think of the Remedies provision of the proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill)?
Do you believe that making this provision law will be good for franchising?
Why or why not? Please share a comment below.
Go back to the main page: PA’s Responsible Franchise Practices Bill: Overview and Discussion
ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE PA RESPONSIBLE FRANCHISE PRACTICES BILL 1620? PLEASE SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.
TAGS: Franchise Remedies, Franchise Renewal Agreements, franchise legislation, PA House Bill 1620, PA Responsible Franchise Practices Bill, Fair Franchising Legislation, Franchise laws, Pennsylvania State Rep. Peter Daley
The Wallaby Windows franchise was founded by Scott Marr, husband of franchise attorney & Congressional…
Gross Law, the Panama City Beach, FL law firm owned by an attorney running for…
The DonutNV Franchise Report chronicles, in real time, one of the most public, documented and…
On May 22 and May 23rd, 2026, Gross Law Firm, on behalf of controversial and…
Upfront Clarification: Congressional candidate Keith Gross, who founded and heads Gross Law Group P.A., has…
Gross Law Group P.A. of Panama City, FL, on behalf of franchisor DonutNV Franchising Inc.,…