(UnhappyFranchisee.Com) Among other things, proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill) states:
§ 918. Remedies.
(a) Relief.–A person that violates this chapter or a regulation of the department shall be liable to the franchisee for legal and equitable relief.
(b) Costs and attorney fees.–A court may award costs and attorney fees to a prevailing franchisee under subsection (a).
What do you think of the Remedies provision of the proposed PA House Bill 1620 (Fair Franchise Practices Bill)?
Do you believe that making this provision law will be good for franchising?
Why or why not? Please share a comment below.
Go back to the main page: PA’s Responsible Franchise Practices Bill: Overview and Discussion
ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE PA RESPONSIBLE FRANCHISE PRACTICES BILL 1620? PLEASE SHARE A COMMENT BELOW.
TAGS: Franchise Remedies, Franchise Renewal Agreements, franchise legislation, PA House Bill 1620, PA Responsible Franchise Practices Bill, Fair Franchising Legislation, Franchise laws, Pennsylvania State Rep. Peter Daley
Which of our political representatives, congressional candidates, Veterans advocacy groups, consumer protection agencies, free speech…
A franchise that targets Veterans with its recession-proof concrete business has vanished without a public notification…
Will congressional candidate Keith Gross reverse his stance on NDAs? Champion free speech for Veterans? …
Update: Florida Politics has revised the headline to read "Keith Gross disputes GoFundMe claims of…
Greater Philadelphia Veterans Network (GPVN) is a 501c3 organization. They claim “We guide Veterans through…
Recent developments have left franchisees worried and uncertain about their futures. To advocate for greater…